01
Write an observation that another reader can check
Record the source as flyer version F1. The observation is that F1 contains the event name, Saturday and Cedar Room, but no start time. This statement can be checked against the supplied text. Avoid replacing it with the organiser never gives details, which makes a broader claim about a person and repeated behaviour. The narrow observation is sufficient for this review. It also allows a straightforward response if the time appears elsewhere: the reviewer can then consider whether the flyer should include that information or point to it.
02
Explain the consequence without overstating it
The relevant consequence is that a reader cannot determine the start time from F1 alone. This does not establish that the event will fail or that every recipient is confused. Keep the consequence tied to the communication being reviewed. A possible request is: please add the start time to the flyer, or include a clearly labelled link where it can be found. The request offers a specific revision while leaving the organiser responsible for supplying the correct time rather than allowing the reviewer to invent one.
03
Save the response and check the revised version
The reusable note has fields for source version, observation, practical consequence, requested change, unknown context and response. If the organiser supplies a new flyer F2, check whether the requested information is present and readable. Do not mark the issue resolved merely because a reply was received. If the organiser explains that a separate invitation contains the time, record that clarification and decide whether the flyer still needs a pointer. The record should show what changed in the communication, not pronounce a verdict on the person who made it.